Page last updated
Thu 3 September 2025 |
The Freshwater Mussels (Unionoida) of the World (and other less consequential bivalves)
FM(U)otW(aolcb) is the web version of the MUSSEL Project Database. Follow the links to browse the data or use the custom Google search field. Either way, you win!
Search the database pages:
Publication Küster (1862): attributed nominal species publication summary Complete CitationKüster, H.C. 1862. Die Flussperlmuscheln (Unio et Hyria). Systematisches Conchylien-Cabinet von Martini und Chemnitz Fortgesetzt von Hofrath Dr. G. v. Schubert und Professor Dr. J.A. Wagner 9(2): 257-318, pls. 68, 87-100. Available electronically.
Attributed Nominal SpeciesLampsilis (Cyrtonaias) tampicoensis kusteriana Frierson, 1927 ‘Lea’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 275, pl. 93, fig. 1 [as ‘Unio tampicoënsis’]. Frierson, 1927. Check List N. Amer. Naiades: 85, sp. 383d. Type(s): TYPE LOST XXX_UNKNOWN, [locality unknown]. | |
Margaritana correyana Küster, 1862 ‘Lea’ of Authors. Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 300. Paetel, 1890. Cat. Conch.-Samml. 3: 173. | |
Margaritana fragilis Küster, 1862 ‘Mousson’ Lea, 1852. Synopsis Fam. Naiades: 45. [nomen nudum]
‘Mousson’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 295, pl. 98, fig. 2. | |
Margaritana holstoniana Küster, 1862 ‘Lea’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 302. | |
Margaritana marginata Küster, 1862 ‘Say’ of Authors.
Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 297, pl. 99, fig. 3.
Sowerby, 1866. Conch. Icon. 16: pl. 51, sp. 267. | |
Monocondylaea rhomboidea Küster, 1862
‘Lea’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 304, pl. 100, fig. 7. | |
Unio bullatus Küster, 1862 ‘Lea’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 311. | |
Unio gabonensis Küster, 1862
Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 291, pl. 97, fig. 7. Type(s): TYPE UNKNOWN, Gabon in West Africa. | |
Unio kotschyi Küster, 1862
Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 267, pl. 90, fig. 5. | |
Unio modulatus Küster, 1862 ‘Raf.’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 311. | |
Unio murchinsonianus Küster, 1862 ‘Lea’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 309. | |
Unio orientalis Küster, 1862 ‘Parreis in sched.’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 267. | |
Unio parreissii Küster, 1862 ‘von dem Busch’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 268. | |
Unio placidus Küster, 1862
‘Lea Mss.’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 262, pl. 88, fig. 2. | |
Unio pumilio Küster, 1862
‘Parreiss is sched.’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 268, pl. 90, fig. 7. | |
Unio rugosus Küster, 1862
‘Gmelin’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 290, pl. 97, fig. 5. | |
Unio saccatus Küster, 1862
‘Anthony’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 263, pl. 89, fig. 2. | |
Unio semiplicatus Küster, 1862
Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 279, pl. 94, fig. 4. | |
Unio sennaariensis Küster, 1862
Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 280, pl. 94, figs. 5-6. | |
Unio spathulatus Küster, 1862 ‘Lea’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 261. | |
Unio tabascoensii Küster, 1862 ‘Charp.’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 309. | |
Unio tampicoensis Küster, 1862
‘Lea’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 275, pl. 93, fig. 1 [as ‘tampicoënsis’]. | |
Unio tavoiensis Küster, 1862 ‘Gould’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 309. | |
Unio turcicus Küster, 1862
 ‘Parreiss in sched.’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 267, pl. 90, figs. 3-4. Type(s): SYNTYPES BMNH_47-5-28-1-2, Brussna. | |
|