Bivalvia | Unionida | Hyrioidea | Hyriidae | Hyriinae

tribe RHIPIDODONTINI Starobogatov, 1970: cladomics

3 genera

Cladomics pages are experimental — even more so than the rest of this site!

The purpose of the cladomics pages for each genus and family-group level taxon is to provide statistics and references indicating the extent to which published phylogenetic work supports the classification used here.

The Cladomics Summary provides an overview of the number of studies that have included terminal species representing this taxon as well as an indication of how frequently it has been recovered as monophyletic.

Following the summary, the available published clades representing the taxon are listed.

For more information, visit the Cladomics FARQ (frequently asked rhetorical questions) page. Abbreviations for the various statistics are explained on the FARQ!

Cladomics Summary

number of species = 45 (48 total)
number of subtaxa (rank: genus) = 3
analyzed in 36 cladograms in 23 publications
maximum number of terminals in an analysis = 6 (mean = 1.47, median = 1)
maximum number of subtaxa (genus) = 3 (mean = 1.14, median = 1)

Basic Monophyly

number of cladograms that test basic monophyly (i.e., more than 1 included species) = 9
maximum number of included terminals = 6, (mean = 2.89 median = 2)
maximum number of subtaxa (genus) = 3 (mean = 1.56, median = 1)
proportion of cladograms that support basic monophyly = 0.56

Rigorous Monophyly

number of cladograms that test rigorous monophyly = 4
(Rigorous monophyly refers to cladograms with terminal species representing more than one subtaxon (genus) taxon and at least one rigorous outgroup (family).
maximum number of included terminals = 6 (mean = 4, median = 3.5)
maximum number of subtaxa (genus) = 3 (mean = 2.25, median = 2)
proportion of cladograms that support rigorous monophyly = 0

Pairwise Cladogram Clustering

The graphs below depict in two dimensions all pair-wise ingroup distances within the cladome. See the Cladmoics FARQ for more information.

Cladograms

Prié et al., 2026 [Publ 4844], fig. 2

** Top Monophyly Cladogram ** ** Top Sister-Group Cladogram **

Santos-Neto et al., 2016 [Publ 3739], fig. 2a_b

Santos-Neto et al., 2016 [Publ 3739], fig. 4

Campbell & Lydeard, 2026 [Publ 4810], fig. 6-14

Huang et al., 2019 [Publ 3843], fig. 2

Huang et al., 2019 [Publ 3843], fig. S3

Huang et al., 2019 [Publ 3843], fig. S4

Graf & Ó Foighil, 2000 [Publ 2649], fig. 1_2

Baker et al., 2003 [Publ 2690], fig. 5

Baker et al., 2004 [Publ 2685], fig. 2-3

Graf & Cummings, 2006 [Publ 1968], fig. 2

Walker et al., 2006 [Publ 2666], fig. 6

Hoeh et al., 2009 [Publ 2716], fig. 3

Hoeh et al., 2009 [Publ 2716], fig. 4

Hoeh et al., 2009 [Publ 2716], fig. 5

Graf et al., 2015 [Publ 3619], fig. 1

Guerra et al., 2019 [Publ 4168], fig. 1

Guerra et al., 2019 [Publ 4168], fig. 2

Campbell & Lydeard, 2026 [Publ 4810], fig. 3_5

Graf, 2000 [Publ 2647], fig. 1

Bogan & Hoeh, 2000 [Publ 2650], fig. 1

Hoeh et al., 2001 [Publ 2652], fig. 14f2

Hoeh et al., 2001 [Publ 2652], fig. 14f4

Graf, 2002 [Publ 2651], fig. 2

Hoeh et al., 2002 [Publ 2653], fig. 2

Roe & Hoeh, 2003 [Publ 2655], fig. 4f2

Roe & Hoeh, 2003 [Publ 2655], fig. 4f3

Marshall et al., 2014 [Publ 3593], fig. 1

Santos-Neto et al., 2016 [Publ 3739], fig. 3_5

Bolotov et al., 2016 [Publ 3743], fig. 2

Bolotov et al., 2016 [Publ 3743], fig. 4

Bolotov et al., 2017 [Publ 3761], fig. S1

Bolotov et al., 2017 [Publ 3761], fig. S2

Konopleva et al., 2017 [Publ 3807], fig. 6

Wu et al., 2021 [Publ 4366], fig. 2_I

Wu et al., 2021 [Publ 4366], fig. 6