|

Data last updated
Mon 1 Dec 2025
|
Publication Küster (1862): summarypublication summary
Full CitationKüster, H.C. 1862. Die Flussperlmuscheln (Unio et Hyria). Systematisches Conchylien-Cabinet von Martini und Chemnitz Fortgesetzt von Hofrath Dr. G. v. Schubert und Professor Dr. J.A. Wagner 9(2): 257-318, pls. 68, 87-100. Available electronically.
Attributed Nominal Species
‘Lea’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 311. (error for Unio pullatus Lea, 1857)
Margaritana correyana Küster, 1862 = Pegias fabula
‘Lea’ of Authors. Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 300. Paetel, 1890. Cat. Conch.-Samml. 3: 173. (error for Margaritana curreyiana Lea, 1840)
‘Mousson’ Lea, 1852. Synopsis Fam. Naiades: 45. [nomen nudum]
‘Mousson’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 295, pl. 98, fig. 2.
Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 291, pl. 97, fig. 7. Type(s): TYPE UNKNOWN, Gabon in West Africa.
‘Lea’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 302. (error for Margaritana holstonia Lea, 1838)
There are 9 available nominal species
attributed to this publication (24 total).
Lampsilis (Cyrtonaias) tampicoensis kusteriana Frierson, 1927 = Mesonaias tampicoensis
‘Lea’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 275, pl. 93, fig. 1 [as ‘Unio tampicoënsis’]. Frierson, 1927. Check List N. Amer. Naiades: 85, sp. 383d. (intro'd as intra-sp. of Unio tampicoensis Lea, 1838) Type(s): TYPE LOST XXX_UNKNOWN, [locality unknown].
‘Say’ of Authors.
Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 297, pl. 99, fig. 3.
Sowerby, 1866. Conch. Icon. 16: pl. 51, sp. 267. (reference to Alasmidonta marginata Say, 1818)
‘Raf.’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 311. (error for Obliquaria (Quadrula) nodulata Rafinesque, 1820)
‘Lea’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 309. (error for Unio murchisonianus Lea, 1834)
Unio orientalis Küster, 1862 = Unio crassus
‘Parreis in sched.’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 267. (intro'd as syn of Unio kotschyi Küster, 1862)
‘von dem Busch’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 268. (error for Unio parreyssi Philippi, 1848)
‘Lea Mss.’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 262, pl. 88, fig. 2.
‘Parreiss is sched.’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 268, pl. 90, fig. 7.
‘Lea’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 304, pl. 100, fig. 7. (misidentified reference to Monocondyloea rhomboidea Lea, 1859)
‘Gmelin’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 290, pl. 97, fig. 5. (reference to Mya rugosa Gmelin, 1791)
‘Anthony’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 263, pl. 89, fig. 2. (homonym of Unio tumidus var. saccatus Rossmässler, 1859)
‘Lea’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 261. (error for Unio spatulatus Lea, 1845)
‘Lea’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 275, pl. 93, fig. 1 [as ‘tampicoënsis’]. (reference to Unio tampicoensis Lea, 1838)
‘Gould’ Küster, 1862. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 309. (error for Unio tavoyensis Gould, 1843)
Taxonomic OpinionsThere are 97 taxonomic opinions from this
publication. Click here to see the full list.
|