|

Data last updated
Mon 1 Dec 2025
|
Publication Küster (1861): summarypublication summary
Full CitationKüster, H.C. 1861. Die Flussperlmuscheln (Unio et Hyria). Systematisches Conchylien-Cabinet von Martini und Chemnitz Fortgesetzt von Hofrath Dr. G. v. Schubert und Professor Dr. J.A. Wagner 9(2): 161-256, pl. 35, 46-86. Available electronically.
Attributed Nominal Species
‘Lamarck’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 165, pl. 48, fig. 1. (reference to Castalia ambigua Lamarck, 1819)
‘Lamarck’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 240, pl. 80, fig. 5. (reference to Unio anodontina Lamarck, 1819)
‘Swainson’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 161, pl. 46, fig. 3. (reference to Unio auratus Philippi, 1847)
‘Lamarck’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 230, pl. 77, fig. 6. (reference to Unio australis Lamarck, 1819)
There are 13 available nominal species
attributed to this publication (48 total).
‘Lea’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 189, pl. 59, fig. 6.
‘Lea’ of Authors. Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 181. Paetel, 1890. Cat. Conch.-Samml. 3: 145. (error for Unio boykinianus Lea, 1840)
‘Millet’ Lea, 1852. Synopsis Fam. Naiades: 39. ‘Millet’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 230. ‘Millet’ Lea, 1870. Synopsis Fam. Naiades: 63. ‘Locard’ Simpson, 1900. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 22: 692. (error for Unio bigerrensis Millet, 1843)
‘Lea’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 177. (error for Unio buckleyi Lea, 1843)
‘Philippi’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 161, pl. 35, fig. 6 [as ‘chiloënsis’].
Unio (Lampsilis) discus var. connectens Martens, 1900 = Disconaias disca
‘von dem Busch’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 242, pl. 81, fig. 1 [as ‘Unio panacoensis’]. Sowerby, 1867. Conch. Icon. 16: pl. 55, sp. 281 [as ‘Unio mexicanus’]. Martens, 1900. Biol. Centr.-Amer., Moll.: 510. (intro'd as intra-sp. of Unio discus Lea, 1838) Type(s): LECTOTYPE ZMB/MOLL.305852 (by Cummings et al., 2025: 177), Rio Panuco, near Tampico.
‘Lea’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 229, pl. 77, fig. 5. (misidentified reference to Unio corrianus Lea, 1834)
‘Lea’ of Authors.
Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 182, pl. 57, fig. 4.
Reeve, 1865. Conch. Icon. 16: pl. 23, sp. 107. (reference to Unio cuneolus Lea, 1840)
Unio delumbis Küster, 1861 = Villosa vibex
‘Conrad’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 207, pl. 69, fig. 1. (misidentified reference to Unio delumbis Conrad, 1834)
‘Spix & Wagner’ of Authors.
Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 238, pl. 80, fig. 2. ‘Spix’ Sowerby, 1868. Conch. Icon. 16: pl. 74, sp. 382. (reference to Diplodon ellipticum Wagner, 1827)
‘Bronn in lit.’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 237, pl. 79, fig. 5. Type(s): SYNTYPE BMNH_1965217, Minas Geraes, Brasilia.
‘Lea’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 205, pl. 68, fig. 6. (misidentified reference to Unio fisherianus Lea, 1838)
‘Benson’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 233. (intro'd as syn of Unio merodabensis Küster, 1861)
Unio gratiosus Küster, 1861 = Unio caffer
‘Parreiss in sched.’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 239, pl. 80, fig. 3. (homonym of Unio gratiosus Philippi, 1843)
‘Lea’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 201, pl. 67, fig. 1. [in part] (misidentified reference to Unio hydianus Lea, 1838)
‘Lea’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 201, pl. 67, fig. 1. [in part] (reference to Unio hydianus Lea, 1838)
‘Lea’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 191, pl. 60, fig. 4. (misidentified reference to Unio kleinianus Lea, 1852)
‘Lea’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 234, pl. 79, fig. 1. (misidentified reference to Unio lugubris Lea, 1838)
‘Lea’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 226, pl. 76, fig. 5. (misidentified reference to Unio moestus Lea, 1841; error for Unio moestus Lea, 1841)
‘Lea’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 245. (error for Unio menkianus Lea, 1838)
‘von dem Busch in lit.’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 233, pl. 78, fig. 4.
‘Conrad’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 245. (error for Unio mississippiensis Conrad, 1850)
Unio mussolianus Küster, 1861 = Unio tigridis
‘Parreiss in sched.’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 244, pl. 82, fig. 1. (renamed Unio mossulianus Kobelt, 1912)
‘Lea’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 218. (error for Unio nicklinianus Lea, 1834)
‘Ziegler, in lit.’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 226, pl. 76, fig. 6.
‘Lea’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 218, pl. 73, fig. 2. (misidentified reference to Unio nux Lea, 1852)
‘von dem Busch’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 242, pl. 81, fig. 1. (reference to Unio panacoensis Philippi, 1843)
‘Lea’ of Authors. Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 220. Modell, 1950. Arch. Moll. 79(4/6): 141. (error for Unio parallelopipedon Lea, 1834)
Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 235, pl. 79, fig. 2. (new name for Unio ambiguus Philippi, 1847)
‘Lea’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 248, pl. 83, fig. 4. (misidentified reference to Unio proximus Lea, 1852)
‘Say’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 162. (error for Unio purpuriatus Say, 1831)
‘Lea’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 197. (error for Unio pusillus Lea, 1840)
‘Lea’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 247. (error for Unio reeveianus Lea, 1852)
‘Rafinesque’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 181. (error for Obliquaria (Quadrula) cyphya Rafinesque, 1820)
‘Lea Mss.’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 252, pl. 85, fig. 2. (homonym of Unio sparsus Lea, 1841)
‘Rafinesque’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 211, pl. 70, fig. 3. (misidentified reference to Obovaria stegaria Rafinesque, 1820)
Unio subrostratus Küster, 1861 = Cambarunio iris
‘Say’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 203, pl. 67, fig. 3. (misidentified reference to Unio subrostratus Say, 1831)
Unio subrostratus Küster, 1861 = Cambarunio iris
‘Say’ Küster, 1861. Conchyl. Cab. 9(2): 203, pl. 68, fig. 1. (misidentified reference to Unio subrostratus Say, 1831)
Taxonomic OpinionsThere are 201 taxonomic opinions from this
publication. Click here to see the full list.
|